The Effect of Functional Physical Training on Improving Sports Performance of College Basketball Players

Abstract

Functional physical training is a multi-dimensional and all-round targeted training designed on the basis of special sports characteristics and athletes' physical evaluation results. Basketball is a high-intensity, intermittent and adversarial sport, and its physical training is crucial to technique and tactics.

The purpose of this study is two: (1) To compare the effects of functional physical training on between groups physical fitness: body shape, body function and sports quality; (2) To compare the effects of functional physical training on physical fitness in each within group: body shape, body function and sports quality.

The study subjects were two college basketball players (12 in each team, aged 18-25) who were preparing for CUBAL. The experimental group used functional physical training and the control group used traditional physical training for 10 weeks, 3 times a week, 90 minutes each time.The functional physical training of the experimental group was divided into three training stages: the first stage (1-3 weeks) : Basic motor function development stage of the body; The second stage (4-7 weeks) : General motor function development stage; Stage 3 (8-10 weeks) : Specific motor function development stage.

In this study, literature, induction and deduction, experiment and mathematical statistics were used to evaluate the effects of the two training methods by measuring athletes' height, weight, BMI, body fat percentage, vital capacity, heart rate change and sports quality indicators (such as strength, power, speed, endurance, agility, flexibility, etc.).

The results show:

(1) Comparison between groups: Functional physical training is superior to traditional training in terms of fat loss and muscle gain and heart rate recovery after exercise, and performs better in terms of strength, flexibility and anaerobic endurance, but there is no significant difference in speed and agility.

(2) Comparison within group: both training methods can effectively reduce body fat percentage, improve cardiopulmonary function and exercise quality, and functional physical training is better than traditional training in improving strength, speed, anaerobic endurance and other aspects.

-